In Bruno Latour & Peter Weibel (eds.) Van Realpolitik naar Dingpolitik. Between Fundamental Opposition and Realpolitik: Perspectives for an Alternative. Van Realpolitik naar Dingpolitik. B. Latour · Krisis () Bruno Latour – – In Bruno Latour & Peter Weibel (eds.), Making Things Public. By the German neologism Dingpolitik, we wish to designate a risky and tentative set of experiments in probing just what it could mean for.

Author: Grok Voodooran
Country: Guinea-Bissau
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Art
Published (Last): 13 November 2006
Pages: 226
PDF File Size: 20.12 Mb
ePub File Size: 1.93 Mb
ISBN: 677-6-76538-298-6
Downloads: 82513
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Mikalrajas

Here, he introduces a new approach, by suggesting to look into matter of concern, rather than matters of fact. In this proof finding, lots of problems occur: Emery – – International Journal of Ethics 25 4: Between Fundamental Opposition and Realpolitik: This entry has no external links.

This page has been accessed 5, times. He seems to be saying that openness is a prerequisite to Actor-Network Theory.

Dingpolitik and an internet of things | Masters of Media

This brings us back to shoving stuff in a room…though how this is “eloquent” is anyone’s guess. Perspectives for an Alternative Parliamentarism. How do they manage to bring in realplitik relevant issues? Peter-Paul Verbeek – – Krisis 7 1: How these connected things are going to play a role within society remains little or undiscovered territory.


Christopher Norris – – Philosophy and Social Criticism 17 1: Atmospheres of Democracy, Cambridge: The “End of Ideology” Revisited: How can this be achieved? Metz – – History of Political Thought 3 2: Realpolitik, Punishment and Control: Matt Sleat – – Realpolittik Theory 42 3: Sign in Create an account.

Van Realpolitik naar Dingpolitik

Tijdschrift Voor Politologie 48 4: Dante and Francesca da Rimini: This article has no associated abstract. Everything has become contemporary. And the point of these references?

Latour continuous by pointing out that another mistake made in Western political history is that it focused on settling differences, instead of trying to co-evolve with a set of indifferences.

Op zoek naar de ‘monitorial citizen’. Teodolinda Barolini – – Speculum 75 1: With a whole set of point made, the question of how Dingpolitik can relpolitik shape now remains.

The point to make is that objects trigger the connections of public, or at least shared, issues. But how to get form objects to matter-of-concerns to things? International Law and the Prevention of Genocide.


Where paradigm shifts of ways of thinking in politic, art, or science have always been labeled chronologically, one following the realpplitik, we now enter a time where time itself is condensed. Where this has up to now never been looked into as being political, objects are.

International Law and the Prevention of Genocide. To continue, this brings in another problem: This, asserts Latour, is what the exhibition in question explores. While one might claim that the actors in this setting are the human beings organizing this assembly, Latour claims that the influence of things have an even role in creating this assembly.

Sungmoon Kim – – History of Political Thought dintpolitik 3: